For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU reviews of literature becomes the most confusing part of the assignment. This is especially true in the case of IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic rigor is expected. However, instruction often feels a bit limited. Students frequently ask if they should write down their book chapters, edit journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing this distinction can alter the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not written to show how much information you've read. It is written to show how well you understand the current research related to the subject you are researching and how your project fits within it. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is essential to know why this chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three principal purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the subject you picked already has been explored in the academic world and is relevant to research. In addition, it allows you to find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Third, it provides a base for your research goals and your methodology.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality, and duplicate content from previous projects or even from online sources. The result is usually lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU does not require original writing when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. In the same way simple explanations are as well discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project, the review of literature should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.

You will be required to read research papers, books or reports, journals and, sometimes, government publications relevant to the subject you are researching. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly link to your research topic.

In the case of example, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks Your literature review should examine earlier research that dealt with financial ratios, banking performance, profitability analysis and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For an ignou project, around fifteen to twenty strong sources are usually enough as long as they're carefully chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals and reputable books written by well-known writers, RBI publications, government reports, and even university research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies, ideally from the last ten years. More recent studies can be added only if the studies are fundamental in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve understanding and perception. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split your literature reviews into sensible sections.

You could organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period methodologies, or the variables examined. For instance, one chapter could focus on studies related profitability, while another could focus on liquidity and the third concerning operational efficiency.

This structure can help evaluators realize that you're not simply copying content, you are actually analysing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is academic, but simple. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary use of jargon. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Each research study you write about should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and the main findings. However, you shouldn't list them chronologically. You should try to link one study to another.

When you've discussed the findings of one study, you could highlight how another author's study supported or challenged those findings. This comparative approach adds complexity to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is to write the literature review as the textbook chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like definition of accounting or the significance of management do not belong in this article unless they are directly linked with previous research.

Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in Your own voice. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas the copying of your review shows dependency.

They also fail to link the literature to their research subject. Every study you reference must be clearly linked to your project objectives.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant result of reviewing literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or if further research is needed.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll realize that most research focused on large organizations smaller firms were neglected. The earlier studies also used secondary data, but the primary data was limited.

This gap becomes the justification for your IGNOU MCOM project submission guide - yarko-zhivi.ru - mcom project. Without it, your project will seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each study covered must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. Citations in text work better and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the literature review should last. There isn't a set rule however, for an ignou mcom project, this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents at to two thousand.

The length should be determined by your topic's complexity. The more expansive topic requires additional research while a focussed topic requires less but more in-depth discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A studied the bank's performance and got good results

Create this type of writing
Write as this: Author A performed a study examining the performance of banks using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability improved because of better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B who also emphasized the role of operational efficiency in boosting return on investment for banks.

This is an approach that demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is appreciated in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get rejected or delayed due to plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if you reference prior studies, the language must be your own.

Utilize plagiarism checking software if feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom project, read the literature review attentively. Check whether each study is relevant, whether the flow of the study is coherent and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the need for my study. If the answer is yes then your literature review is on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou-mcom project can be a challenge at first particularly for students who are returning to college after a long absence. But once you recognize that it's all about connection and analysis rather than memorization, the task can be accomplished.

You should take the time to read, think and write with your own voice. Your effort is evident in the final project and frequently makes the difference between an average submission and a impressive one.