Many students taking part in IGNOU studying books is the most confusing section of the work. This is especially the case for students working on an IGNOU MCOM project writing services (wattmt2.ucoz.com) MCOM project where academic depth is expected. However, the direction often feels limited. Students frequently ask if they should write down their book chapters, make journal articles more readable, or simply collect quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that a difference could affect the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not intended to be a record of how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the current work in relation to your topic and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link concepts with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, it is important to understand why this chapter is needed in an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three principal purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the subject you have chosen has been researched before and has a scientific significance. It also helps you discern gaps or deficiencies in prior research. It also provides an outline for your research objectives and methodological.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or online sources. The result is usually small marks or project failure. IGNOU will require original content even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. The same time explaining in the simplest way is prohibited. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You are expected to review books, research papers journals, reports, and sometimes government publications related to your research area. The concentration should be on the studies closely related to your research topic.

As an example, if the project focuses on the financial health of banks In your literature review, you must focus on earlier research related to financial ratios, the performance of banks, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One of the most common mistakes students make is choosing too many different sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For an ignou mcom project, around fifteen to twenty powerful sources are generally enough provided they are selected with care.

The best sources are academic journals, reputed books by known writer, RBI books, public reports and university level research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent especially those from the past 10 years. It is possible to include older studies only if they're fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of writing short summaries that are not organized, divide sections of the review in clear sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter depending on the theme, the time period techniques, methodologies, or variables examined. For example, one section may discuss studies related to profitability, another may focus on liquidity, and a third is focused on operating efficiency.

This structure helps evaluators understand that you are not just copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be straightforward but academic. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Each study you analyze should contain the name of author, the year of study, the research objectives, methods, and major findings. However, don't list them in a linear manner. Try to connect one research with a different one.

In the case of discussing one study, you may be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted the findings. This method of comparison adds the depth of your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting and the meaning of management doesn't belong in this article unless they are directly linked in previous studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in your own words. This shows your understanding. using copying can show dependency.

Students often fail to connect the literature to their research topic. Every study you reference must have a clear connection to the goals of your project.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main outcomes of the review of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU evaluators expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know and where further research is required.

After reviewing a number of studies, you will notice that the majority of studies focused on large corporations and small businesses were absent. And earlier studies used secondary data while primary data was not as extensive.

This gap serves as the rationale for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your work will appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency is more important than perfect.

Each study covered must appear in the reference list at the end of the study. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. Citations in text work better and is more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long their literature reviews should run. There's no definitive rule that can be followed, however for an MCOM project, the chapter generally spans from fifteen to between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topic complexity. A topic that is more extensive requires the most research, whereas a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

A review that is too long and without analysis does not improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A has studied the bank's performance and got good results

Write it like this
This author performed a study examining the performance of banks with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased due to improved asset management. This result was later confirmed by Author B who stressed the role played by operational efficiency when it comes to improving bank returns.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is what counts in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are denied or delayed because of duplicated literature reviews. However, even if you use prior studies, the language you use must reflect the original.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou master of commerce research, read through your literature review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, if you can follow the logic of the review and whether it is linked naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reasons why my study is required. If yes, then your study's literature reviews are on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou MCOM project is not easy at first particularly for students who are returning back to their academics after a period of. But once you recognize that it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, the task is a lot easier.

You should take the time to read, consider, and write in your personal voice. This effort will be evident in the final work. It often marks the difference between the average submission and a good one.