For a lot of students studying at IGNOU review, reviewing research becomes the most confusing component of their project. This is especially true for those who are working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic depth is expected. However, the direction often isn't as clear. Students usually inquire if they are required to summarize books or modify journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.
Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much material you have read. It is written to show how well you understand the literature that is relevant to the subject you are researching and how your project fits in. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to connect the theory and research direction.
Before writing anything, is crucial to understand why this chapter is needed in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three major purposes.
It first shows that the subject matter you've chosen has been researched before and is of academic importance. Second, it helps you determine the gaps or shortcomings in previous studies. Thirdly, it establishes the foundation for your research goals and methods.
Many students treat this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous projects or from online sources. The result is usually lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU requires original work even when discussing previous studies.
IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. While doing so it is recommended that students write in a simple way. also discouraged. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.
It is expected that you read research papers, books journals, reports and sometimes government publications related to your field of study. The emphasis should be placed on studies which directly relate to the research area you are studying.
For example, if your project is on financial performance of banks, then your literature review should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously about financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies and risk evaluation.
One common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom anywhere between fifteen and twenty quality sources are usually sufficient in the event that they are carefully selected.
Academic journals are a good option as well as reputable books by renowned writers, RBI publishing, state reports as well as university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.
Always go for the most recent research most likely from the past 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they are fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.
A well-organized chapter can improve comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of composing random summaries, divide each literature overview into logical sections.
You can arrange the chapter in accordance with themes, time period method, variables, or methodologies researched. For example, one section might discuss studies on profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity, and a third about operational effectiveness.
The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're more than just taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.
The style of writing should be academic but simple. Avoid using a lot of words and terms. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.
Each study you discuss should include the author name, the year of study, the methodological objective, principal findings. It is not necessary to list them chronologically. Make an effort to link one study with the other.
For instance, after discussing one study, it is possible to write about how a different author's research supported or contradicted those findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds complexity to your ignou project.
One frequent error is writing the literature review as an academic chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like what accounting is and the meaning of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research.
Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your literature review should be written in individual words. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying shows dependence.
They also fail to link publications to their personal research issue. Every study you write about should be in a direct connection to your project objectives.
One of the major outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU examiners expect you be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed and where further research is required.
When you look over a range of studies you will notice that the majority of research focused on large firms however small companies were ignored. And earlier studies used secondary data, but the primary data was not enough.
This is why it's the main reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project could appear to be repetitive.
When writing the review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.
All studies discussed must be included in the reference list at the end of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.
Avoid footnotes for literature review. The in-text citation is better and looks more professional in an IGNOU MCOM project synopsis - via draftivo.online, MCOM project.
Students often ask how long an essay on literature should run. There is no set amount in the case of an ignou for an mcom project, the length typically spans from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.
The length should be determined by what the topic's difficulty. A broader topic requires more research. A more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.
Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no analysis doesn't improve scores.
Instead of writing as this
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance, and found positive results
Write in this manner
In the year A, Author B conducted a study of bank performance with financial ratios. He found that profitability improved due to better asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role played by operational efficiency in boosting bank returns.
This strategy demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is essential to an MCOM project.
IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are refused or delayed because of plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if you cite prior studies, the language needs to reflect your unique style.
Make use of plagiarism-checking tools if possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is superior to copied perfection.
Before you submit your ignou project, read the literature review attentively. Verify that each research is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain why my study is needed. If the answer is yes, then that literature study is in the right track.
Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project may initially be challenging especially for those who return to university after a gap. However, once you realize that it's an analysis and connection, rather that memorization, the work is manageable.
Take time to read, consider, and write with your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly in your final product and often makes the difference between the average submission and a impressive one.
