There are many students who enroll in IGNOU and IGNOU, the study of literature becomes the most confusing aspect of the work. This is particularly true in the case of an ignou-mcom project in which academic depth is expected, yet guidance frequently feels limited. Students often ask if they should summarize their books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply collect quotes. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding this distinction can alter the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not a report of how much literature you've read. It is written to show how well you know the current research related to the topic of your choice and how you project fits within it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter as it shows your ability to connect concepts with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it is crucial to comprehend why this chapter is needed in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three main functions.

First, it shows that the subject you picked has been researched before and has relevance to academic research. Furthermore, it will help you find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Thirdly, it serves as the foundation for your research objectives and methodological.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier projects or from online sources. This typically results in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU demands original writing even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. The same time those who write merely to explain their ideas are also discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

The expectation is to look over books, research papers journal articles, reports, or even publications from the government that relate to your field of study. The main focus should be on those studies which are directly related to the area of your study.

If, for instance, your research is focused on the financial performance of banks So, your literature reviews should focus on earlier studies concerning financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is deciding to use too many disparate sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For an IGNOU Project MCOM (just click the up coming internet site) mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 strong sources are usually enough when they're well-chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals, reputed books by known writer, RBI publication, reports from the government, and university level research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies and ideally, from the last ten years. Some older studies are acceptable only if they are foundational in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of writing short summaries that are not organized, divide the literature review into logical sections.

You could organize the chapter depending on the theme, the time period research methodology, or other variables studied. For instance, one section might discuss studies on profitability, another may focus on liquidity, and yet another on operational efficiency.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're not copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be straightforward but academic. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary terms. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.

Each study you analyze should include the author name, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and most important results. However, don't list them in a linear manner. Try to connect one study with the other.

For instance, following discussion of some research, you might explain how another author's work supported or refuted these findings. This approach of comparing studies adds richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One frequent error is writing the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management is not appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked to other studies.

Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your review of literature should be written by you in you own language. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas copying demonstrates dependency.

Students also forget to link studies to their own research focus. Every study you reference must have a clear connection to the objectives of your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major outcomes of a review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluators expect you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or the areas where more study is required.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll realize that most studies focused on large corporations, while small firms were left out. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, but the primary data was not enough.

This void is the reason for your project ignou mcom. Without it, the project might seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but quality is more important than consistency.

All studies discussed must be included in the list of references at the end of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Don't use footnotes to review literature. Citations in text work better and looks cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the book review needs to run. There's no standard rule to follow, but for an MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.

The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. For a broad topic, you will need more research, while a targeted topic requires fewer, but deeper discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance and got good results

Write like this
The author A conducted a study about bank performance by using financial ratios. He found that profitability improved by a better management of assets. This conclusion was later validated by Author B in his study, who focused on the role of operating efficiency in boosting bank profits.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is what counts in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to copy-pasted literature reviews. Although you may refer to prior studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is far better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom project, make sure you read the literature review thoroughly. Verify that each research is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent, and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear what my study needs to be done. If yes, then your research paper is right on path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project can be a challenge at first particularly for those returning into academics after a time off. But once you know that it's more about connecting and analysis than memorizing information, the task is easy to handle.

Be sure to read, consider, and write in your unique voice. This is reflected on your final product and often determines the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. powerful one.