For a lot of students studying at IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most complicated element of the project. This is especially true when working on an IGNOU MCOM project writing services mcom assignment, in which academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually can be difficult to find. Students are often asked if they must summarize books, rewrite journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that a distinction could alter the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is NOT written to illustrate how much of the literature you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the current research related to your subject and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter due to your ability to link the theory and research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it must be understood why this chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three primary functions.

First, it shows that the subject you picked is one that has been studied in the past as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Thirdly, it assists you identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. Thirdly, it serves as an outline for your studies' goals and research methodology.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality and take content from other projects or online sources. This approach usually results in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. However those who write merely to explain their ideas are as well discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You're required to read books, research papers or reports, journals and even government publications pertaining to your area of study. The concentrate should be on studies that directly link to your area of study.

For example, if you research focuses on the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously regarding financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake made by students is picking too many unrelated sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom, around fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice should they be selected carefully.

A good source is academic journals and reputable books written by well-known authors RBI publishing, state reports as well as university research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

It is always best to choose recent studies that are from the last 10 years. These older studies may be included only if they're of a fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves the readability and impact. Instead of writing random summaries and essays, you should divide chapters of a literature analysis into logical sections.

The chapter can be organized by themes, time period and methodology or even variables studied. For example, one section might discuss studies on profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity and another about operational effectiveness.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you are not just copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be academic but simple. Avoid excessive language and vocabulary. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.

Each study you discuss should be accompanied by the name of the author, year of study, research objectives, methods, and significant findings. However, you shouldn't list them in a linear manner. Try to connect one research with another.

For instance, after discussing one study, you could mention how another author supported or contradicted those findings. This type of analysis adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review as the textbook chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like definition of accounting or the significance of management doesn't belong here unless directly linked to studies that have been done previously.

Another error is overquoting. Your literature review should be written by you in the style of your personal words. This shows your understanding. copying demonstrates dependency.

Students are also prone to not linking study findings to their own study. Each study you reference should be in line with the goals of your project.

Connecting Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major result of reviewing literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluators expect you to be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed or where further study is needed.

When you look over a range of studies you may observe that most studies focused on large corporations however small companies were neglected. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, but the primary data was not enough.

This is a reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your program could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.

Every study to be discussed must be included in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. Citations in text work better and is more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the reviews of books should be. There isn't a set rule and for an ignou MCOM project, the chapter generally ranges from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should be determined by the complexity of the topic. A bigger topic will require greater research, whereas a focused topic needs fewer but more in-depth discussions.

A review that is too long and without any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A studied the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results

Write this way
Author A conducted research on the performance of banks based on financial ratios. She concluded that profitability increased because of improved asset management. This was later validated by Author B who highlighted the role played by operational efficiency in increasing returns to banks.

This approach emphasizes understanding and analysis, which can be valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are blocked or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Although you may refer to earlier studies, the language must be your own.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible, and modify content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, reread the literature review carefully. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, if the flow is consistent and if the chapters naturally connect to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes then that literature study is in the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou-mcom project could be daunting at first particularly for those returning to school after a break. If you can realize that it's about connection and analysis, rather than memorization of information, the task is easy to handle.

Make time to read, think, and write in your personal voice. That effort reflects clearly into the final version of your work. This often makes the difference between an average submission and a good one.