There are many students who enroll in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most confusing aspect of their project. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou MCOM project where academic depth is expected, however guidance often seems to be a little sluggish. Students generally ask whether they should write down their book chapters, write journal articles in a different way, or simply collect quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that difference can change the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not intended to demonstrate how much of the literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the current work in relation to the topic you're researching and how your work fits in. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is crucial to comprehend why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three primary purposes.

First, it demonstrates that the subject you chose already has been explored and has a scientific significance. Additionally, it can help you find gaps or weaknesses in previous studies. Thirdly it helps you establish an outline of your research objectives as well as your method of study.

Most students view this section as a formality, and take content from other projects or online sources. This typically results in small marks or project failure. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. At the same time simple explanations are as well discouraged. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

It is expected that you read books, research papers and reports, as well as journals and occasionally, government publications that relate to your subject. The focus should be on studies which directly relate to your research field.

In the case of example, if your project focuses on the financial health of banks Then your literature review should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously dealing with financial ratios efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is picking too many unrelated sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For an ignou project roughly fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient in the event that they are carefully selected.

These are good sources for academic journals reliable books from well-known writer, RBI publications, federal reports as well as university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

It is always best to choose recent studies and ideally, from the last ten years. It is possible to include older studies in the event that they are fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves perception and readability. Instead of composing random summaries, divide sections of the review in clear sections.

It is possible to organize the chapter based on themes, time period methods, or variables which are being studied. For instance, one section could focus on studies related profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity, and yet another about operational effectiveness.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're not simply copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be straightforward but academic. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary words. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.

Each study that you talk about must include the name of the author, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and principal findings. Be careful not to list them chronologically. It is best to connect one study with another.

For example, after discussing an article, you can describe how another researcher supported or challenged those findings. This sort of comparative approach will add an additional dimension to your ignou MCOM project work IGNOU (polyinform.com.ua) project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like definition of accounting or meaning of management doesn't belong here unless directly linked to other studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in yourself. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas copying implies dependence.

They also fail to link books to their own research focus. Every study you reference must be clearly connected to your objectives for your project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant outcomes of reviewing the literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or if further research is required.

After discussing multiple studies, it's possible that research focused on large firms and small businesses were left out. And earlier studies used secondary data while primary data were not sufficient.

This void is the reason for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, the project might appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however consistency matters more than perfection.

Each study must be mentioned in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. The in-text citation is better and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of an essay on literature should be. There's no definitive rule to follow, but for an for an mcom project, the length generally runs between fifteen hundred in length to 2500 words.

The length should be determined by the level of complexity of the topic. The more expansive topic requires the most research, whereas a focussed topic requires less but deeper discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of bank performance and discovered good results

Write as this
For example, author A performed a study examining the performance of banks with financial ratios. He found that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B, who emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in increasing return on investment for banks.

This approach reflects an understanding and analysis that is appreciated in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are refused or delayed because of published literature reviews that have been copied. Even if the reference is to previously published studies, the style ought to be uniquely yours.

Use plagiarism detection tools if feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM project, read the entire literature review. Make sure that each study is relevant, whether you can follow the logic of the review and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain the need for my study. If the answer is yes you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review to be used in an ignou mcom assignment isn't easy at first especially for those who return to college after a long absence. When you realize it's about analysis and connection rather that memorization, the work is a lot easier.

Make time to read, think and write with your own voice. That effort reflects clearly in the final draft and often can be the difference in being a weak submission and an average one. solid one.