Many students taking part in IGNOU studying studies can be the most challenging part of the assignment. This is especially the case for those working on an ignou mcom assignment, in which academic depth is expected but guidance often appears to be limited. Students frequently ask if they should summarize their books, rewrite journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that difference can change the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not meant to display the quantity of information you've read. It is written to show how much you comprehend current research related to the topic you're researching and how your project fits in. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter as it shows your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is essential to know why this chapter is needed in an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three essential functions.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you selected has been researched before and has academic relevance. Second, it aids you find gaps or weaknesses in prior research. The third is that it creates an outline of your research objectives and methodology.

Students often view this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous assignments or online sources. This can result in small marks or project failure. IGNOU does not require original writing when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. The same time extremely basic explanations are not permitted. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

You're required to read research papers, books and reports, as well as journals and sometimes, government publications related to the subject you are researching. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly pertain to the research area you are studying.

In the case of example, if your task is to study the financial performance of banks Your literature review should focus on prior research on financial ratios, financial performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake made by students is combining too many irrelevant sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 solid sources are typically enough in the event that they are carefully selected.

The best sources are academic journals reliable books from well-known names, RBI publication, reports from the government, and university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies that are from the last ten years. More recent studies can be added but only if it is foundational in nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves readership and impression. Instead of writing random summaries, break up sections of the review in sensible sections.

You can structure the chapter by themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables investigated. For instance, one section may discuss studies related to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity while the other one on operational efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you're more than just copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be straightforward but academic. Avoid a lot of language and terms. IGNOU MCOM project synopsis (cbsver.bget.ru) values clarity over complexity.

Each study that you talk about must include the author name, year of study, objective, methodology, and main findings. However, do not list them in a linear manner. Try to connect one research with another.

For example, after analyzing some study, you can highlight how another author's study supported and/or refuted the findings. This type of analysis adds depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review as an academic chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like the definition of accounting and the meaning of management do not belong in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written in you own language. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas the copying of your review shows dependency.

Students may also not link sources to their own research topic. Every research you present should have a clear connection with your project objectives.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main results of the examination of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to expose what researchers of the past missed or where further study is required.

After examining a variety of studies, it's possible that research was focused on large companies however small companies were overlooked. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data but primary data were not sufficient.

This gap becomes the justification for your projects ignou.com. Without it, your work will seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency matters more than perfection.

Each study covered must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. Citations in text work better and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the reviews of books should last. There is no fixed rule, but for an ignou for an mcom project, the length typically ranges from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. A more broad subject requires greater research, whereas a targeted topic requires fewer, but deeper discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A studied bank performance and discovered good results

Write this in the same way as
This author conducted a study on banking performance using financial ratios. They concluded that profitability increased due to improved asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who pointed out the role played by operational efficiency in improving bank returns.

This approach reflects an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if you refer to previously published studies, the style should be unique to your project.

Check for plagiarism using tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom project, make sure you read the entire literature review. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, if the flow is logical and if the chapter flows naturally towards your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason the reason for why I need to study it. If yes then your review on literature will be in the best track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou project could be daunting at first Particularly for students returning into academics after a time off. When you realize it's an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, it is easy to handle.

Spend time reading, think and write in your unique voice. Your effort is evident in the final draft and can make the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a impressive one.