For many students enrolled in IGNOU, the review of studies can be the most challenging element of the project. This is particularly true when working on an ignou-mcom project where academic depth is expected. However, the direction often isn't available. Students often ask if they must summarize books, modify journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that differences can affect the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not a report of the amount of material you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the literature that is relevant to the topic you're studying and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter as it shows your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is crucial to understand why this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three principal purposes.

It first shows that the subject matter you've chosen has been researched before and has a scientific significance. Thirdly, it assists you identify any gaps or limitations from prior research. Thirdly it helps you establish an overview of your research objectives as well as your method of study.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or other sources online. This can result in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU expects original writing even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. On the other hand those who write merely to explain their ideas are being discouraged. In the case of an IGNOU Project MCOM (linked resource site) mcom assignment, the review of literature must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

You're expected review books, research papers journals, reports and occasionally, government publications that relate to your topic. The concentrate should be on studies related to your research area.

As an example, if the project focuses on the performance of financials of banks In your literature review, you should examine earlier research that dealt with financial ratios, efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom in the range of 15 to 20 quality sources are usually sufficient when they're well-chosen.

The best sources are academic journals reliable books from well-known authors RBI publishing, state reports as well as university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years especially those from the past 10 years. More recent studies can be added in the event that they are fundamental in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter increases the readability and impact. Instead of composing random summaries of the work, break down the literature review into sensible sections.

The chapter can be organized based on themes, time period research methodology, or other variables that are studied. For instance, one chapter might focus on studies that relate to the financial performance, while another may focus upon liquidity, while another focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure helps evaluators understand that you're more than just copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid a lot of language and vocabulary. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.

Each research study you write about should include the name of the author, the year of study, the objectives, the methodology used, and important findings. Do not, however, list them in a formal manner. It is best to connect one study with the other.

For instance, following discussion of some study, you can discuss how a different author's findings supported the results or countered them. The comparative approach adds more depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

An error that is often made is to write the literature review like an academic chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like definition of accounting or the significance of management is not appropriate here unless directly linked to earlier studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written by you in yourself. This shows your understanding. copying shows dependency.

Students also forget to link literature with their own research study. Each study you discuss should be in a direct connection to your research goals.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant outcomes of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU reviewers expect you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or the areas in which further research is required.

After discussing multiple studies, it is possible to observe that the majority studies focused on large corporations in contrast to small businesses being disregarded. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, but the primary data were not sufficient.

This is a reason for your project ignou mcom. Without it, the project might appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

All studies discussed must be included in the list of references at the end of the study. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. A citation in text works better and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the length of their review on literature ought to run. There is no set amount however, for an ignou mcom project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topic complexity. The more expansive topic requires additional research while a focused topic needs fewer but more extensive discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A analyzed bank performance and came across positive results

Write like this
This author conducted a study about bank performance using financial ratios. It concluded that profitability increased through better asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who stressed the role of operation efficiency in improving bank profitability.

This is an approach that demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is considered important in an ignou MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get rejected or delayed due to plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if the reference is to previous studies, the language has to be distinctly yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting an ignou mcom research, read through the entire literature review. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, whether the flow is rational, and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the reason for why I need to study it. If yes your literature review is on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou MCOM project could be daunting at first particularly for those returning to university after a gap. When you realize it is all about connection and analysis rather than memorizing, the job is manageable.

Do your best to read, think, and write in your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly in the final project and often makes the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a powerful one.