For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU reviews of literature can be the most confusing part of the assignment. This is especially the case for those who are working on the ignou mcom course, where academic rigor is expected, but the guidance isn't as clear. Students are often asked if they are required to summarize books or write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing how different approaches can impact the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not meant to display how much content you've read. It is written to show how well you know the current research related to your subject and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter due to your ability to link ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is essential to know why this chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three essential functions.

First, it demonstrates that the topic you chose has been researched before and has academic significance. The second is that it assists you to identify gaps or limitations in prior research. It also provides an outline of your research goals and methods.

Many students treat this chapter as a formality and take content from other assignments or other online sources. This approach usually results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU does not require original writing when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. While doing so any explanation that is not basic is also discouraged. For a project involving ignou MCOM, the review of literature must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

You're expected review books, research papers and reports, as well as journals and even government publications pertaining to your topic. The attention should be focused on studies relevant to your research area.

As an example, if the task is to study the financial performance of banks and banks, then your literature search should focus on earlier studies dealing with financial ratios performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For a project in ignou roughly fifteen to twenty sturdy sources is usually sufficient in the event that they are carefully selected.

Excellent sources include academic journals and reputable books written by well-known creators, RBI documents, Government reports and university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies especially those from the past ten years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they're of a fundamental in study.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries, you can divide all the reviews of books into logical sections.

You may organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period, methodology, or variables which are being studied. For instance, one chapter may cover studies related profitability, another may focus on liquidity, and yet another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure assists evaluators to understand that you are not just copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple and academic. Avoid using a lot of words and words. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.

Every study you review should contain the name of author, year of study, goal, methodology, and significant findings. Do not, however, list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Try to connect one research with a different one.

If you're discussing some study, you can explain how another author's work supported or contradicted those findings. This type of analysis adds the depth of your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management is not appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked to previous studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in individual words. In the end, paraphrasing is an indication of understanding, while the copying of your review shows dependency.

Many students do not connect study findings to their own topic. The research you refer to should have a clear connection with the goals of your project.

Establishing a linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important result of the study of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluators expect you to demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or where further study is needed.

In a discussion of multiple studies you'll find that a lot of research focused on large firms but small companies were neglected. Some studies have used secondary data but primary data was not enough.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your program could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however consistency matters more than perfection.

Each research study should be included in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. A citation in text works better and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of an essay on literature should run. There's no set timeframe, but for an ignou MCOM project, the chapter generally spans from fifteen to in length to 2500 words.

The length should depend on how complex the topic is. A larger topic demands more study, while a focussed topic requires less but more extensive discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A has studied the bank's performance and got good results

Create this type of writing
The author A carried out a study on the performance of banks based on financial ratios. She concluded that profitability improved because of improved asset management. This was later validated by Author B He emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in boosting returns for banks.

This approach reflects an understanding and analysis that is considered important in an IGNOU MCOM project writing services (2or.blogsky.com) mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are cancelled or delayed due duplicated literature reviews. Even if you reference earlier studies, the language must be your own.

Make use of plagiarism-checking tools if possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed will be more appealing than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou project, reread the review of literature carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, if your flow follows logically, and whether the chapters naturally connect to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes, it's on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature as part of an ignou master's thesis might be difficult at first especially for students returning to university after a gap. However, once you realize that it's all about connection and analysis rather than recitation, the challenge can be accomplished.

Spend time reading, think and write in your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected on the final piece and often determines the difference between an average essay and a powerful one.