For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU studying literature can be the most complicated section of the work. This is especially true when working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic rigor is expected. However, guidance usually seems to be a little sluggish. Students usually ask if must summarize books, make journal articles more readable, or simply gather quotes. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that a distinction could alter the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not intended to demonstrate how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend literature that is relevant to your subject and how your work fits in. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter since it showcases your ability to connect theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is crucial to consider the reasons this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three main functions.

It first shows that the subject you have chosen has been extensively studied and has academic significance. Furthermore, it will help you determine the gaps or shortcomings in prior research. Thirdly, it serves as a base for your research goals and your methodology.

Many students treat this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or from online sources. This often results in failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU expects original writing even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. At the same time, very basic explanations are too much to be avoided. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review should reflect postgraduate knowledge.

You'll be expected to read books, research papers report, journals, and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your subject. The study should focus on topics which are directly related to the research area you are studying.

For instance, if the task is to study the financial performance of banks the literature review will focus on prior studies on financial ratios, the performance of banks, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. If you are looking to build an ignou mcom business, around fifteen to twenty powerful sources are generally enough in the event that they are carefully selected.

These are good sources for academic journals and reputable books written by well-known authors RBI books, public reports and even university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research at least from the last 10 years. Some older studies are acceptable only if they're of a fundamental in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized and organized chapter enhances comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down an overview of literature into clear sections.

You can arrange the chapter according to themes, time period research methodology, or other variables the authors have studied. For instance, one section may focus on research studies related to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity while the other one on operational efficiency.

This structure assists evaluators to understand that you are not just copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid dense language and excessive jargon. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Every research you share should include the name of its author, year of study, objectives, the methodology used, and main findings. It is not necessary to list them in a linear manner. Do your best to link one study with a different one.

For example, after discussing your findings from one study, highlight how another author's study supported or opposed those findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

An error that is often made is to write the literature review as a textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management is not appropriate here unless directly linked to prior studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in an individual way. In the end, paraphrasing is an indication of understanding, while writing in a copy shows dependency.

Students also forget to link publications to their personal research topics. Every study you mention should have a clear connection with the objectives of your project.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key outcomes of a review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluaters want you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or indicate where additional research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you'll notice that the majority of research focuses on large enterprises smaller firms were ignored. It is also possible that previous studies used secondary data while primary data was not enough.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your projects ignou.com. Without it, your program could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.

All studies discussed must be included in the reference list at the end of the study. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. A text-based citation is more efficient as it appears cleaner in an IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (just click the up coming internet page) MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the reviews of books should run. There isn't a set rule however, for an ignou MCOM project, the chapter generally spans from fifteen to up to two thousand words.

The length should depend on the complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more research, while a specific topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without an analysis won't help marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A analyzed the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write as such
An author conducted a study of banking performance by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role of the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank profitability.

This method is based on the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is valued in an ignou MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are delayed or rejected due to duplicated literature reviews. Even if you refer to previous studies, the terminology is yours.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is superior to copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Prior to submitting your ignou mcom project, go back through the literature review attentively. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether the flow of the study is coherent, and whether the chapters flow naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the need for my study. If the answer is yes, your research paper is right on track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou mcom project might be difficult at first especially for those who return to academics after a gap. However, once you realize that it's about connection and analysis, rather than memorization, the project is a lot easier.

Spend time reading, think and write in your personal voice. The result of your efforts will be apparent on the final piece and often the difference is between the average submission and a good one.