In the case of many students at IGNOU reviewing literature can be the most confusing section of the work. This is particularly true in the case of an ignou mcom assignment, where academic depth is expected, but the guidance feels limited. Students usually inquire if they should write down their book chapters, write journal articles in a different way, or simply take notes of quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing how different approaches can impact the overall quality of the project.
A literature review is not a report of how much material you have read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the current research related to the topic you're researching and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to connect the theory and research direction.
Before writing anything, it is vital to understand the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three main purposes.
It first shows that the topic you selected is one that has been studied in the past and has academic relevance. Second, it aids you identify gaps or limitations in previous studies. Thirdly, it serves as an overview of your research objectives and methodological.
Students often view this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This typically results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing the results of existing studies.
IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. In the same way extremely basic explanations are discouraged. For a project involving ignou MCOM the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.
You'll be expected to read research papers, books, journals, reports, or even publications from the government that relate to your area of study. The concentration should be on the studies closely related to your area of study.
For instance, if the study is about the financial performance of banks So, your literature reviews must focus on earlier research concerning financial ratios profitability analysis, banking performance and risk evaluation.
One of the most common mistakes students make is to select too many irrelevant sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For an ignou project anywhere between fifteen and twenty powerful sources are generally enough should they be selected carefully.
These are good sources for academic journals highly regarded books by well-known the authors RBI publications, government reports, and university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.
Always go for the most recent research which are typically from the last 10 years. Older studies can be included only if they're fundamental in terms of.
A well-organized section improves the readability and impact. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down all the reviews of books into clear sections.
You can structure the chapter based on themes, time period, methodology, or variables researched. For instance, one chapter may examine studies that pertain to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, and yet another focused on the efficiency of operations.
This structure aids in understanding that you are not just copying content, you are actually analysing it.
The style of writing is to be professional but easy. Avoid excessive language and vocabulary. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.
Each research study you write about should include the author's name, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as major findings. It is not necessary to list them in a linear manner. Try to connect one study with a different one.
When you've discussed an article, you can describe how another researcher supported or refuted the findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds depth to your ignou mcom project.
The most common error is writing the literature review like an academic chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as what accounting is and the meaning of management do not belong in this article unless they are directly linked in previous studies.
Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. This shows your understanding. copying shows dependency.
Students often fail to connect literature with their own research study. Any study you discuss must have a clear link to your project objectives.
One of the most important results of the review of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU assessment committees expect you expose what researchers of the past missed or where further study is required.
After looking over several studies, it is possible to observe that the majority studies were focused on large businesses as small businesses were absent. Some studies have used secondary data, while primary data were not sufficient.
This gap serves as the rationale for your an ignou project. Without it, your project could appear repetitive.
While writing the review of literature The proper citation of the source is essential. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but it is more about consistency than perfection.
Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the end of the study. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.
Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. A citation in text works better and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.
Students frequently ask what the length of the literature review should last. There is no fixed rule in the case of an ignou to do an MCOM project the chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred in length to 2500 words.
The length should be determined by topic complexity. A more broad subject requires more study, while a concentrated topic will require less but deeper discussions.
Inadequately long reviews and no the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.
Instead of writing this way,
Author A analyzed the bank's performance and got good results
Write this way
Author A conducted a study about banking performance using financial ratios, and found that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This finding was later supported by Author B who highlighted the importance of operation efficiency in improving returns to banks.
This is an approach that demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which can be valued in an MCOM project.
IGNOU MCOM project synopsis is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are refused or delayed because of the use of copied literature reviews. If you do refer to previous studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.
Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is superior to copied perfection.
Before submitting an ignou mcom project, go back through the entire literature review. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, whether the flow of the study is coherent, and whether your chapter will naturally lead to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear why my study is needed. If yes, then this review of literature is definitely on the right path.
Writing a literature review as part of an ignou master's thesis might be difficult at first particularly for those returning to academics after a gap. But once you recognize that it's about connection and analysis, rather than memorization of information, the task is manageable.
It is important to take time to read, think, and write with your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly on the final piece and frequently makes the difference between one that is average and a powerful one.