For many students enrolled in IGNOU The review of studies can be the most challenging part of the assignment. This is especially the case for those who are working on an ignou MCOM project in which academic depth is expected, however guidance often isn't clear. Students usually ask if must write summaries of books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding how different approaches can impact the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is NOT written to illustrate how much information you've read. It is written to show how well you comprehend prior work on the topic you're researching and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is crucial to understand why this section is part of an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three principal purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you selected was studied before and has academic significance. In addition, it allows you to recognize gaps or limitations in earlier studies. Thirdly, it serves as an outline for your research objectives as well as your method of study.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or even from online sources. This usually leads to low marks or project rejection. IGNOU demands original writing even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. But the use of very basic explanations is too much to be avoided. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

It is expected that you read books, research papers report, journals, and occasionally, government publications that relate with your field. The main focus should be on those studies which directly relate to the research area you are studying.

In this case, for example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks Your literature review should be focused on previous studies that dealt with financial ratios, profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is to select too many irrelevant sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For an ignou project in the range of 15 to 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient as long as they're carefully chosen.

The best sources are academic journals reliable books from well-known the authors RBI publications, federal reports and even university research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies particularly those that have been published in the last ten years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they are foundational in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves quality of reading and impression. Instead of writing random summaries and essays, you should divide sections of the review in logical sections.

The chapter can be organized according to themes, time period methods, or variables investigated. For instance, one section might discuss studies on the profitability of a business, while another section may concentrate on liquidity while the other is focused on operating efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you're not copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary words. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.

Each study that you talk about must contain the name of author, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as principal findings. Don't mention them in a linear manner. Try to connect one research with another.

For example, after discussing an article, you can mention how another author supported or refuted these findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds complexity to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One frequent error is writing the literature review like an academic chapter. Simply explaining concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management does not belong here unless directly linked to prior studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written by you in one's own terms. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying shows dependence.

Many students do not connect sources to their own research subject. Every research you present should be in a direct connection to the goals of your project.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important result of reviewing literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or where further study is needed.

After reviewing a number of studies, it is possible to observe that the majority studies focus on large organisations, while small firms were left out. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, whereas primary data was scarce.

This gap can be the motivation for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your plan could appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature, proper citation is essential. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.

Each study covered must appear in the reference list at the end of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. In text citation works better and appears more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the reviews of books should run. There's no set timeframe but, for an IGNOU Project MCOM (why not look here) mcom project, this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents to two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on how complex the topic is. A larger topic demands more research. A narrowly focused subject requires less but deeper discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no analysis doesn't improve scores.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write it like this
Autor A conducted research on bank performance using financial ratios and concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. This was later validated by Author B, who emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in improving bank earnings.

This approach is based on the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are rejected or delayed due to copies of literature reviews. Even if you cite previous studies, the language is yours.

Use plagiarism checking tools if possible, and modify content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom research, read through your literature review carefully. You should determine whether the research is relevant, whether the flow of information is clear, and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify the reason for why I need to study it. If the answer is yes you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou project may initially be challenging particularly for students returning back to their academics after a period of. When you realize it is about connection and analysis, rather than recitation, the challenge is manageable.

Do your best to read, think, and write in your own voice. That effort reflects clearly on the final piece and often can be the difference in an average project and a high-quality one.