For many students enrolled in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most complicated aspect of their project. This is especially the case for students working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic rigor is expected but guidance often can be difficult to find. Students typically ask if they should summarize their books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that difference can change the overall quality of the project.
Literature reviews are not a report of how much content you've read. It is written to show how well you understand the works that are currently being done on the topic you're researching and how your work fits in. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter since it showcases your ability to link the theory and research direction.
Before beginning any writing, it is vital to understand the reason this chapter exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three major purposes.
First, it demonstrates that the topic you chose has been extensively studied in the academic world and is relevant to research. Furthermore, it will help you recognize gaps or limitations in previous studies. Thirdly it helps you establish a base for your research objectives and methodological.
Many students take this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous projects or other sources online. This is a common practice that results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing studies that are already in progress.
IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. While doing so it is recommended that students write in a simple way. prohibited. In an ignou project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.
It is expected that you read books, research papers, journals, reports, as well as government publications that are related to your research area. The emphasis should be placed on studies relevant to the area of your study.
As an example, if the task is to study the financial performance of banks So, your literature reviews should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously about financial ratios profitability analysis, banking performance, and risk assessment.
One of the most common mistakes students make is selecting too many non-related sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For an ignou mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 strong sources are usually enough should they be selected carefully.
These are good sources for academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned the authors RBI publishing, state reports and university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.
Always prefer recent studies especially those from the past 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered but only if it is foundational in terms of.
A well-organized and organized chapter enhances understanding and perception. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down an overview of literature into clear sections.
You may organize the chapter according to themes, time period methods, or variables to be studied. For instance, one section may cover studies related profitability, whereas a different section could focus upon liquidity, while another is focused on operating efficiency.
This structure helps evaluators understand that you are not just replicating content but are actually analyzing it.
The style of writing should be straightforward but academic. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary jargon. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.
Each study that you talk about must include the author name, year of study, objective, methodology, and main findings. Don't mention them in a linear manner. Try to connect one research with the other.
For instance, when discussing the findings of one study, you could explain how another author's work supported or challenged those findings. This sort of comparative approach will add greater depth to your project.
A common error is to write the literature review in the form of the kind of chapter in a textbook. Basic concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management is not appropriate here unless directly linked to studies that have been done previously.
Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas copying shows dependence.
Students often fail to connect sources to their own research area. Any study you discuss must be in line with your research goals.
One of the key result of reviewing literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU assessors require you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know or indicate where additional research is needed.
After reviewing a number of studies, you'll notice that the majority of research focused on large organizations smaller firms were overlooked. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data but primary information was not enough.
This gap can be the motivation for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.
In writing a review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.
Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.
Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. The in-text citation is better and appears more professional in an ignou MCOM project.
Students often inquire about how long their literature reviews should last. There isn't a set rule to follow, but for an MCOM project, the chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.
The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. A topic that is more extensive requires more studies, while a specific topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.
Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no analysis doesn't improve scores.
Instead of writing as this
Author A did a thorough study of bank performance and discovered good results
Write this in the same way as
Autor A conducted a study about the performance of banks using financial ratios, and found that profitability improved because of better asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the importance of the efficiency of operations in enhancing return on investment for banks.
This approach reflects the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is valued in an ignou MCOM project.
IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to published literature reviews that have been copied. Even if your reference is to past studies, your language is yours.
Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible. If you are able, modify your content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed will be more appealing than perfect copying.
Before submitting your ignou mcom task, revisit the literature review carefully. You should determine whether the research is relevant, if the flow is logical and if the chapter flows naturally towards your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the need for my study. If yes your review on literature will be in the best path.
Reviewing literature to complete an ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project (https://pacheco.ru/bitrix/redirect.php?goto=http://www.aykhal.info/go/url=http://N.i.Gh.t.m.a.re.zzro@masuda-khrs.sakura.ne.jp/hsy/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread) research project may initially be challenging particularly for students who are returning to school after a long hiatus. If you can realize that it is all about connection and analysis rather than recitation, the challenge becomes easy.
Spend time reading, think, and write in your own voice. It is reflected clearly in your final product and often the difference is between two submissions: a standard one and a impressive one.
