There are many students who enroll in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most complicated aspect of the work. This is particularly true when working on IGNOU's MCOM project work IGNOU ; simply click the next website, projects, in which academic depth is expected. However, instruction often feels a bit limited. Students are often asked if they should write down their book chapters, amend journal articles, and simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is NOT written to illustrate how much material you have read. It is written to show how well you comprehend previous work that pertains to your field and how your work fits in. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter as it shows your ability to connect theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is vital to understand the reason this chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three principal purposes.

It first shows it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been researched before and has academic relevance. Furthermore, it will help you identify gaps or limitations in previous studies. Thirdly it helps you establish a base for your studies' goals and research methodology.

A lot of students view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier projects or online sources. This practice usually leads to failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing studies that are already in progress.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. But any explanation that is not basic is being discouraged. In an ignou project, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You will be required to read research papers, books journals, reports and, sometimes, government publications relevant with your field. The concentration should be on the studies that directly connect with your research field.

As an example, if the research focuses on the financial performance of banks the literature review should focus on earlier studies dealing with financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For an ignou project in the range of 15 to 20 quality sources are usually sufficient as long as they're carefully chosen.

The best sources are academic journals highly regarded books by well-known authors, RBI publishing, state reports and university level research papers. Websites that lack clarity on the author should be avoided.

The best studies are those that are current which are typically from the last 10 years. The older studies may be included only if they're of a fundamental in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves perception and readability. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split sections of the review in logical sections.

You can organize the chapter based on themes, time period methods, or variables researched. For instance, one chapter may focus on research studies related to profitability, another may focus on liquidity, and yet another regarding operational efficiency.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you are not just replicating content but are actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is academic, but simple. Avoid dense language and excessive terms. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Every research you share should include the name of the author, year of study, objective, methodology, and principal findings. Be careful not to list them in a formal manner. Make an effort to link one study with another.

For instance, when discussing your findings from one study, discuss how a different author's findings supported or refuted the findings. This comparative approach adds depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One frequent error is writing the literature review in the form of the kind of chapter in a textbook. Explaining basic concepts such as definition of accounting or the significance of management are not needed here unless directly linked to other studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your literature review should be written in the style of your personal words. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas copying indicates dependence.

Students also forget to link study findings to their own issue. Every study you write about should be clearly linked to your objectives for your project.

Connecting Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important outcomes of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluators expect you to explain what the previous researchers missed or where further study is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you will notice that the majority of studies centered on large organizations however small companies were neglected. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, but primary data was not enough.

This void is the reason for your an ignou project. Without it, your plan could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

Each study mentioned must be listed in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. The in-text citation is better and is cleaner when used in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the literature review should last. There isn't a set rule however, for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter generally spans from fifteen to at to two thousand.

The length of the discussion should be based on how complex the topic is. A topic that is more extensive requires greater research, whereas a particular topic will require fewer, but more extensive discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of bank performance and discovered good results

Write this way
Write as this: Author A conducted a study of bank performance using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability improved due to better asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role played by operational efficiency in enhancing bank earnings.

This is an approach that demonstrates understanding and analysis, which is essential to an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get blocked or rejected because of review of literature that has been copied. If you do refer to earlier studies, the language you use must reflect the original.

Make use of plagiarism-checking tools if possible. Then, rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is far better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom task, revisit the literature review thoroughly. Examine whether every study is relevant, if your flow follows logically and if your chapter will naturally lead to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this section explain why my research is necessary. If the answer is yes, it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou project might be difficult at first especially for students returning to academics following a gap. But once you understand that it's all about connection and analysis rather than memorizing, the job is manageable.

You should take the time to read, think and write in your own voice. That effort reflects clearly in your final work and frequently makes the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. strong one.