There are many students who enroll in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most complicated portion of their work. This is particularly true for those working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic depth is expected but guidance often can be difficult to find. Students typically ask if they should summarize their books, rewrite journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not written to show the amount of material you've read. It is written to show how well you know the prior work on the topic you're researching and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU evaluators look closely at this chapter due to your ability to link the research directions with your theory.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it must be understood why this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three primary purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the area you've selected has been studied earlier and has academic relevance. Thirdly, it assists you discover gaps or issues in previous studies. Thirdly it helps you establish an outline of your research goals and your methodology.

A lot of students view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. The result is usually very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU expects original writing even when discussing studies that are already in progress.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. The same time explaining in the simplest way is as well discouraged. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

You will be required to read research papers, books journal articles, reports, and sometimes government publications related to your subject. The primary focus should be on research related to the area of your study.

For instance, if the research focuses on the financial performance of banks, then your literature review should be focused on previous studies on financial ratios, financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common error students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 good sources can be found for a good selection.

Excellent sources include academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous creators, RBI documents, Government reports and even university research papers. Websites that have unclear authorship should be avoided.

Always look for studies that are more recent especially those from the past ten years. These older studies may be included but only if it is foundational in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries, divide your literature reviews into logical sections.

You could organize the chapter depending on the theme, the time period as well as the methodology or variables the authors have studied. For example, one section may examine studies that pertain to profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity, and a third is focused on operating efficiency.

This structure helps evaluators understand that you're not copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be academic but simple. Avoid using a lot of words and terms. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Every study you review should include the name of the author, year of study, research objectives, methods, and the main findings. However, do not list them chronologically. Try to connect one research to another.

When you've discussed some research, you might highlight how another author's study supported or disputed those findings. The comparative approach adds more depth to your ignou MCOM project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review like a textbook chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like definition of accounting or meaning of management does not belong here unless directly linked to previous studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in one's own terms. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying demonstrates dependency.

Students may also not link books to their own research topics. Every study you write about should have a clear link to the objectives of your project.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important results of a review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or indicate where additional research is required.

After reviewing a number of studies, you'll find that a lot of studies were focused on large businesses in contrast to small businesses being absent. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data but primary information were not sufficient.

This gap becomes the justification for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your work will seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but coherence is more important than perfection.

Each study mentioned must be listed in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. In-text citations are more efficient and appears more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of an essay on literature should last. There's no definitive rule, but for an ignou for an mcom project, the length typically spans from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should depend on topics' complexity. For a broad topic, you will need additional research while a specific topic requires fewer but deeper discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without the ability to analyze them does not boost marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of banking performance and found good results

Write as such
In the year A, Author B carried out a study on banking performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased because of better asset administration. This result was later confirmed by Author B who also emphasized the role of operational efficiency when it comes to improving return on investment for banks.

This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is what counts in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of published literature reviews that have been copied. Even if you refer to other studies, your language needs to reflect your unique style.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible, and modify content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom project, go back through the review carefully. Review each article to determine if it is relevant, whether the flow is consistent and if the chapter flows naturally towards your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear why my study is needed. If yes this review of literature is definitely on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou MCOM project work IGNOU (hop over to here) project could be daunting at first especially for students returning to university after a gap. But once you understand that it is more about connecting and analysis than memorization, it becomes manageable.

You should take the time to read, consider, and write in your unique voice. This is reflected in the final project and often the difference is between your average work and a solid one.