For many students enrolled in IGNOU studying books is the most confusing part of the project work. This is especially true in the case of an ignou MCOM project where academic rigor is expected but guidance often can be difficult to find. Students typically ask if they must summarize books, modify journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that difference can change the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not written to show how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate that you are knowledgeable about the current work in relation to the topic of your choice and how you idea fits in with it. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link the research directions with your theory.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, is crucial to consider the reasons this section is part of an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three main goals.

First, it demonstrates that the topic you selected has been researched before and has academic significance. Furthermore, it will help you discern gaps or deficiencies in earlier studies. In addition, it can provide an understanding of research objectives as well as your method of study.

Most students view this section as a formality, and copy content from their previous assignments or other online sources. This approach usually results in poor marks or even project rejection. IGNOU demands original writing even when addressing existing research.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU Project MCOM (http://www.laosubenben.com/home/link.php?url=http://otef.sakura.ne.jp/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread) doesn't expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. In the same way it is recommended that students write in a simple way. also not recommended. In an ignou project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

You're expected review research papers, books journals, reports, and even government publications pertaining with your field. The emphasis should be placed on studies relevant to your research topic.

For example, if you project focuses on the performance of financials of banks the literature review should focus on prior research that dealt with financial ratios, efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One of the most common mistakes students make is picking too many unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom, around fifteen to twenty good sources can be found if they are well chosen.

These are good sources for academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned names, RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and university research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies that are from the last 10 years. More recent studies can be added only if the studies are fundamental in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter increases perception and readability. Instead of writing random summaries, you can divide an overview of literature into sensible sections.

You could organize the chapter by theme, time period methods, or variables researched. For example, one section might discuss studies on profitability, another may focus on liquidity, and yet another about operational effectiveness.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you are not just copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be simple but academic. Avoid excessive language and words. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Every study you review should include the name of its author, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as principal findings. However, you shouldn't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Make an effort to link one study with the other.

For instance, when discussing your findings from one study, highlight how another author's study supported or refuted the findings. This sort of comparative approach will add an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One frequent error is writing the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as what accounting is and the meaning of management doesn't belong in this section unless it is directly connected in previous studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your literature review should be written in an individual way. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas copying shows dependence.

Students often fail to connect literature with their own research subject. Every study you write about should have a clear connection with the objectives of your project.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant results of the examination of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or indicate areas where further research is required.

After examining a variety of studies, it's possible that studies focus on large organisations, while small firms were not considered. The earlier studies also used secondary data, but the primary data was not as extensive.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your project may appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the reference list at the end of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. The in-text citation is better and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the review of literature must run. There is no set amount, but for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter typically ranges from fifteen hundred or two thousand words.

The length should be determined by the level of complexity of the topic. A larger topic demands more study, while a focussed topic requires less but more extensive discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A researched bank performance and discovered good results

Create this type of writing
An author conducted research on bank performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability improved due to better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B, who emphasized the role of the efficiency of operations in enhancing returns for banks.

This strategy demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is highly valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get rejected or delayed due to copies of literature reviews. Even if you cite previously published studies, the style needs to reflect your unique style.

Check for plagiarism using tools if possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM project, reread the entire literature review. Examine whether every study is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent, and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reason for why I need to study it. If yes, your study's literature reviews are on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou MCOM project could be daunting at first particularly for students who are returning into academics after a time off. When you realize it's about analysis and connection rather than recitation, the challenge becomes easy.

It is important to take time to read, think and write with your own voice. This is reflected in the final draft and can make the difference between an average project and a solid one.