In the case of many students at IGNOU studying literature can be the most elusive section of the work. This is especially the case for students working on an ignou project for mcom, where academic depth is expected, but the guidance isn't clear. Students typically ask if they have to write a summary of books, revise journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that difference can change the quality of the entire project.
A review of literature is not written to show how much of the literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you understand the literature that is relevant to your topic and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link theory with research direction.
Before writing anything, however, it must be understood why the section exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature review serves three primary purposes.
In the first place, it indicates it is clear that the topic you've chosen is a subject that has been studied previously and is of academic importance. Second, it aids you identify any gaps or limitations from prior research. Thirdly it helps you establish the foundation for your research objectives and methodology.
A majority of students view this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This can result in small marks or project failure. IGNOU will require original content even when addressing existing research.
IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. However it is recommended that students write in a simple way. also not recommended. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.
The expectation is to look over books, research papers journal articles, reports, and sometimes even government publications related to your research area. The attention should be focused on studies which directly relate to your research topic.
In this case, for example, if your task is to study the financial performance of banks the literature review must focus on earlier research regarding financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis and risk evaluation.
A common mistake made by students is selecting too many unrelated sources. It's more about quality than quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project between 15 and 20 quality sources are usually sufficient provided they are selected with care.
An excellent source of information is academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous the authors RBI books, public reports and university level research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.
Always pick studies from recent years particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they're fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.
A well-organized chapter will improve comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of composing random summaries, break up each literature overview into sensible sections.
The chapter could be structured in accordance with themes, time period, methodology, or variables researched. For instance, one chapter may discuss studies related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity while the other regarding operational efficiency.
This structure aids evaluators in understanding the difference between copying content, but you are analyzing it.
The writing style should be simple but academic. Avoid overly complicated language and vocabulary. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.
The study you are discussing should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the goal, methodology, and main findings. However, do not list them in a logical manner. Make an effort to link one study to another.
For instance, after discussing some research, you might discuss how a different author's findings supported the results or countered them. This approach of comparing studies adds complexity to your ignou project.
A common mistake is to write the literature review like it is a textbook chapter. The need to explain the fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management does not belong here unless directly linked in previous studies.
Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written in individual words. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas using copying can show dependency.
Students also forget to link study findings to their own area. Every study you mention should be in a direct connection to the goals of your project.
The most important results of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU examiners expect you explain what the previous researchers missed or indicate areas where further research is required.
In the course of discussing several studies it's possible that research was focused on large companies while smaller companies were disregarded. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, while primary data was not enough.
This is why it's the main reason for your an ignou project. Without it, the project might appear repetitive.
In writing a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.
Each study mentioned must be listed in the reference list at the end of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.
Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. In-text citations are more efficient and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project.
Students frequently ask what the length of the writing review must last. There is no set amount however, for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter generally ranges from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.
The length of the discussion should be based on topics' complexity. A broad topic will require greater research, whereas a particular topic will require fewer, but more in-depth discussions.
Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no an analysis won't help marks.
Instead of writing as this
Author A studied the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results
Write in this manner
In the year A, Author B conducted research on the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This result was later confirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role played by operational efficiency in boosting bank profitability.
This strategy demonstrates the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is essential to an mcom project.
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get cancelled or delayed due review of literature that has been copied. Even if your reference is to previous research, the language will have to match your own.
Utilize plagiarism checking software if possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is superior to copied perfection.
Before submitting your IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (lakestarrsolutionsllc.com) mcom task, revisit your literature review carefully. Check whether each study is relevant, if it flows in a logical manner, and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain the reasons why my study is required. If the answer is yes your review on literature will be in the best path.
Writing a literature review to be used in an ignou mcom assignment could be daunting at first particularly for those returning into academics after a time off. When you understand that it is more about connecting and analysis than memorizing information, the task becomes easier to manage.
It is important to take time to read, consider, and write in your unique voice. This dedication is clearly reflected on your final product and often can be the difference in an average project and a impressive one.