Many students taking part in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature can be the most complicated aspect of the work. This is especially the case for those working on the ignou mcom course, in which academic depth is expected, however guidance often appears to be limited. Students generally ask whether they must write summaries of books, revise journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

A review of literature is not intended to be a record of how much you've read. It is written to show how well you understand the current research related to your subject and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU evaluators look closely at the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it is important to understand why this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three essential functions.

In the first place, it indicates that the subject you have chosen was studied before and has a scholarly significance. The second is that it assists you to detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. Thirdly, it establishes an outline of your research objectives and methodological.

Many students take this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous projects or online sources. This typically results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU expects original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. At the same time it is recommended that students write in a simple way. not permitted. For an ignou mcom project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.

You're expected to study books, research papers Journals, reports, and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your subject. The focus should be on studies which directly relate to the research area you are studying.

In this case, for example, if your research is focused on the financial performance of banks, then your literature review should focus on earlier studies that dealt with financial ratios, bank performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake made by students is selecting too many non-related sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou-mcom project between 15 and 20 high-quality sources are often enough for a good selection.

Some good sources are academic journals highly regarded books by well-known authors, RBI publication, reports from the government, and even university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

It is always best to choose recent studies at least from the last ten years. Other studies from the past may be considered in the event that they are fundamental in their nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances perception and readability. Instead of composing random summaries and essays, you should divide this literature summary into logical sections.

You may organize the chapter by themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables examined. For instance, one chapter may discuss studies related to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity while the other is focused on operating efficiency.

This structure can help evaluators realize that you're not simply copying content, you are actually analysing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid using a lot of words and vocabulary. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.

Every research you share should contain the name of author, year of study, research objectives, methods, and most important results. Do not, however, list them in a logical manner. Make an effort to link one study with the other.

In the case of discussing some study, you can highlight how another author's study supported the results or countered them. This approach of comparing studies adds an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One frequent error is writing the literature review like the kind of chapter in a textbook. Discussing fundamental concepts like what accounting is and the meaning of management is not a good idea here unless directly linked to earlier studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your literature review should be written in one's own terms. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying indicates dependence.

They also fail to link study findings to their own issue. Each study you discuss should be clearly linked to the objectives of your project.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of most important results of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU examiners expect you demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or the areas in which further research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you'll realize that most studies focus on large organisations while smaller companies were neglected. In the past, studies utilized secondary data, but primary data was limited.

The gap in the picture is the reason for your project ignou mcom. Without this, your project could appear to be repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.

All studies discussed must be included in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Lack of references could raise doubts over authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. The in-text citation is better and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the writing review must be. There is no set amount but, for an ignou mcom project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topic complexity. The more expansive topic requires more research. A focussed topic requires less but more extensive discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A analyzed bank performance and discovered good results

Write this in the same way as
The author A conducted a study of banking performance using financial ratios. It found that profitability improved through better asset management. This result was later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the role played by operational efficiency in improving bank profitability.

This method is based on understanding and analysis, which is a must in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to published literature reviews that have been copied. Even if the reference is to past studies, your language will have to match your own.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project (Hisupplier writes) project, go back through the literature review attentively. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, if the flow of information is clear and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify the need for my study. If the answer is yes, then your study's literature reviews are on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou mcom project may initially be challenging especially for students returning to school after a break. But once you understand that it's all about connection and analysis rather than recitation, the challenge becomes manageable.

You should take the time to read, think, and write in your unique voice. This is reflected in your final work and often determines the difference between an average essay and a strong one.