For many students in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature becomes the most confusing part of the project work. This is especially true in the case of the ignou mcom course, where academic depth is expected. However, the direction often isn't clear. Students usually inquire if they should summarize their books, refret journal articles or simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not intended to be a record of how much literature you've read. It is written to show your understanding of the works that are currently being done on your field and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU examiners examine this chapter due to your ability to connect the theory and research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is important to understand why this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three main goals.

First, it demonstrates that the subject matter you've chosen has been researched before in the academic world and is relevant to research. The second is that it assists you to identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. Third, it provides a base for your research goals and your methodology.

Many students see this chapter as a formality, and take content from other projects or other sources online. This typically results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when discussing studies that are already in progress.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. The same time extremely basic explanations are too much to be avoided. For a project involving ignou MCOM the literature review will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

The expectation is to look over books, research papers journals, reports and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your area of study. The primary focus should be on research that directly connect with the research area you are studying.

If, for instance, your project focuses on the financial health of banks the literature review should examine earlier research concerning financial ratios bank performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting too many non-related sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou project roughly fifteen to twenty solid sources are typically enough provided they are selected with care.

Some good sources are academic journals well-known books written by renowned writers, RBI documents, Government reports and even university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

The best studies are those that are current, ideally from the last 10 years. It is possible to include older studies only if they are foundational in the sense that they are fundamental in.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well organized chapter improves quality of reading and impression. Instead of composing random summaries, break up chapters of a literature analysis into logical sections.

You could organize the chapter around themes, a time period methods, or variables that are studied. For example, one section may discuss studies related to profitability, whereas another might focus upon liquidity, while another focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see the difference between replicating content but are actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple but academic. Avoid using a lot of words and language. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each study you discuss should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the purpose, method, and important findings. However, you shouldn't list them in a linear manner. Do your best to link one study with the other.

For example, after discussing one study, you may write about how a different author's research supported or challenged those findings. This kind of approach can add richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review like an academic chapter. It is important to clarify the basic concepts, such as definition of accounting or meaning of management are not needed in this section unless it is directly connected in previous studies.

Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written in an individual way. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas writing in a copy shows dependency.

They are also often unable to link literature with their own research area. Every study you mention should have a clear connection with the objectives of your project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important result of the study of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or the areas in which further research is required.

After having discussed a myriad of studies you may observe that most studies were focused on large businesses in contrast to small businesses being ignored. It is also possible that previous studies used secondary data, but the primary data was not as extensive.

This gap is the basis for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature A proper citation is necessary. IGNOU MCOM project help (http://www.rohitab.com/) generally recognizes APA style, however being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes when reviewing literature. Citations in text work better and appears more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the writing review must be. There is no fixed rule that can be followed, however for an to do an MCOM project the chapter generally spans from fifteen to or two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topics' complexity. A broad topic will require the most research, whereas a focussed topic requires less but deeper discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A has studied the bank's performance and got good results

Write as this
In the year A, Author B conducted a research study on bank performance with financial ratios. He found that profitability improved through better asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B who highlighted the role played by operating efficiency in boosting the bank's returns.

This strategy demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are stopped or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Even if the reference is to earlier studies, the language will have to match your own.

Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever possible. You can also rewrite your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is more effective than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou assignment, you should read the review of literature carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether the flow is logical, and whether the chapter is logically linked to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain why my study is needed. If the answer is yes, your literature review is on the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou mcom project may feel challenging at first Particularly for students returning into academics after a time off. Once you realize that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorizing, the job becomes easy.

Read, think, and write with your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected on the final piece and often marks the difference between an average essay and a powerful one.