For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU, the review of literature can be the most confusing component of their project. This is especially the case for those who are working on IGNOU's mcom projects, in which academic depth is expected. However, instruction often can be difficult to find. Students usually ask if are required to summarize books or revise journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much of the literature you've read. It is written to show how well you understand the existing work related to the subject you are researching and how your research fits into it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter due to your ability to connect theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is important to understand why this chapter is necessary in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three main goals.

It first shows it is clear that the topic you've chosen already has been explored in the academic world and is relevant to research. Second, it helps you recognize gaps or limitations in earlier studies. The third is that it creates a base for your research goals and methods.

Students often view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous projects or online sources. This can result in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU demands original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. Additionally, very basic explanations are as well discouraged. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review should reflect postgraduate level understanding.

You'll be expected to read research papers, books or reports, journals and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your research area. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly pertain to the area of your study.

In the case of example, if your project is on financial performance of banks Your literature review should be focused on previous studies dealing with financial ratios profitability analysis, banking performance and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One of the most common mistakes students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For an ignou mcom project roughly fifteen to twenty powerful sources are generally enough as long as they're carefully chosen.

A good source is academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous writers, RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies that are from the last 10 years. It is possible to include older studies only if the studies are fundamental in way.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances understanding and perception. Instead of composing unstructured summaries, split sections of the review in clear sections.

The chapter can be organized by theme, time period method, variables, or methodologies that are studied. For instance, one chapter could discuss research related to profits, whereas another may focus upon liquidity, while another is focused on operating efficiency.

This structure aids in understanding that you're not taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid using a lot of words and jargon. IGNOU MCOM project writing services - http://m.shopintampabay.com/redirect.aspx?url=http://www.Aykhal.info/go/url=http://N.i.Gh.t.m.a.re.zzro@masuda-khrs.sakura.ne.jp/hsy/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread - is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Every research you share should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the research objectives, methods, and principal findings. However, you shouldn't list them mechanically. Make an effort to link one study with a different one.

For example, after analyzing an article, you can describe how another researcher supported or opposed those findings. This kind of approach can add the depth of your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

One of the most frequent mistakes is to write the literature review in the form of the textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like definition of accounting or meaning of management doesn't belong in this article unless they are directly linked to prior studies.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written in your own words. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas copying demonstrates dependency.

Students often fail to connect publications to their personal research subject. Every study you mention should have a clear connection with your research goals.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major outcomes of the review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know or the areas where more study is required.

In a discussion of multiple studies you'll realize that most studies focus on large organisations and small businesses were left out. In the past, studies utilized secondary data while primary data was scarce.

This is a reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project could appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however consistency is more important than perfect.

Every study discussed must appear in the reference list at the end of the study. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. Citations in text work better and looks cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the writing review must run. There's no rule of thumb but, for an ignou to do an MCOM project the chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred in length to 2500 words.

The length should be determined by the complexity of the topic. A broad topic will require the most research, whereas a focused topic needs fewer but deeper discussions.

Writing unnecessarily long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A has studied banking's performance and obtained good results

Write this in the same way as
Write as this: Author A carried out a study on banking performance by using financial ratios. He concluded that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the role of operational efficiency in improving returns to banks.

This method is based on an understanding and analysis that is essential to an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to duplicated literature reviews. If you do refer to previous research, the language must be your own.

Use plagiarism checking tools as possible. If you are able, modify your content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou research, read through the review of literature carefully. Check whether each study is relevant, if the flow of information is clear and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes then it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review to complete an ignou mcom research project could be daunting at first especially for those who return to school after a break. But once you know that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, the project is manageable.

Make time to read, consider, and write with your own voice. This effort will be evident on the final piece and often can be the difference in being a weak submission and an average one. impressive one.