While the gameplay possibilities that can spawn from a World War 3-focused game is are a perfect fit for the Battlefield series, the story is likely to fall into a common trap that many modern-day shooters have stumbled into. Based on Battlefield 6 ’s World War 3 rumors , the game’s narrative and multiplayer teams will be NATO vs. Russia, a move that sees the latter once again positioned as the villains. Not only have many players grown tired of fighting Russia in every game, but Russian players have become even more frustrated about constantly being displayed as mindless villa

Reputable leaker Tom Henderson is claiming Battlefield 6 is going to kick things up a notch. The shooter will reportedly have up to 128 players in each match and bring a new level of destructibility. Henderson claims that Battlefield 4's popular "Levolution" system will be making a grand return. In Battlefield 4 , players could trigger scripted sequences that caused chaotic events like skyscrapers to come tumbling down. Battlefield 6, which will be set in the modern-day , will supposedly see that same concept but in a less scripted manner. Instead of the building falling the exact same way each time, it'll fall depending on how the building was damaged and targeted. In theory, this will make it a far more versatile and dynamic system, so players have to defend the entire building as opposed to just key target poi

If DICE wants to make the best use of Battlefield 6 ’s supposed setting, World War 3 should live up to its name. Every side of the conflict should be given their own motivations, with no obvious "good guy" or "bad guy" to follow. The game's War Stories should show this, painting the United States as villainous in a Russian campaign while doing the same thing in NATO missions if this is indeed accur

At the same time, calling the game Battlefield could purely be used to get away from the failures of Battlefield 5 as opposed to giving the series a fresh beginning. Regardless, fans will not have to wait too much longer to find out if these rumors are true, as a reveal is confirmed to be coming in spring. If the leak proves true, though, it is hard to deny that DICE and EA are pulling from one of the biggest video game franchises of all time – and their direct competition. If this truly is the case, hopefully this soft reboot of Battlefield will prove just as successful as Modern Warfare ’s

A World War 3 setting would instantly give DICE the chance to deliver on its ambitious ideas for Battlefield 6 , as the game could feature an array of weapons from around the world. Instantly giving DICE plenty of options for day one guns and post-launch additions, today’s most popular weaponry can be wielded by players. Beyond that, older gear would be viable as well, as a global conflict would involve less militarily advanced countries as well — justifying the use of some more outdated but equally fun to use guns and equipment. Vehicles, a crucial part of every Battlefield 2042 vehicles|https://battlefield2042play.com/ experience, would have no limitations either. Tanks, helicopters, and cars from around the world could be added, providing some more variety to the overall experie

Further, the game’s maps could truly blow fans away. One map can be set in the Kremlin, with the Russian citadel being heavily damaged in one of the war’s central conflicts. An even more visually impressive locale to fight in could see Battlefield fans duking it out in Paris, with a fully destructible Eiffel Tower being a standout feature of the map — and a way to bring Battlefield 4 ’s Levolution back in a meaningful way. A map near Buckingham Palace or Big Ben could be wildly fun, while taking some inspiration from the White House level in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 ’s campaign could lead to an equally exciting map. As long as the locations are not purely focused on size and spectacle, maps based on potential World War 3 conflicts could heavily enhance the experience of Battlfield

With the conflict essentially boiling down to two sides standing still and firing at each other while reloading wildly slow lever action rifles, it seems best that Battlefield avoids the Civil War. While there is fun to be had from Civil War simulation games , and DICE could play with history like it did during Battlefield 1 , it would be better to avoid the setting entirely. With no vehicles apart from horses and a massive lack of weapon variety, The Civil War is a poor fit for the franch

On the flip side, DICE may stray even further from the tone of the Bad Company games by going hyperrealistic with the next title. With the power of next-gen consoles, the series can look even more stunning in terms of visuals, matching the boosted player count with an absurd level of detail. Pulling from Modern Warfare even further, the next Battlefield game could be grittier and more realistic. Finally including gore in multiplayer, pulling from real world events, and showing the collateral damage that war can cause are all ways that Battlefield can become more focused on realism than it already is. A darker look at warfare that looks at the concept of World War 3 in a more mature way, a serious style could renew interest just like it did for Modern Warfa