If you inquire of one IGNOU M.Com student what worries them most in the final year The answer isn't always the paper on theory. The most important thing is the project. It's not because the project is impossible, but because nobody can explain it in an easy and straightforward manner. The guidelines appear formal, the language of university seems distant senior citizens often say, "Bas format follow karo." This instruction is not comprehensive.
An M.Com course at IGNOU isn't about showing the latest research skills. It is about showing that you are knowledgeable about your subject enough to investigate a genuine issue, critically analyze it, and present it in the most organized way. When you are aware of this approach and the process becomes manageable, it is easier to complete. This article will show you how to write an M.Com research project to IGNOU University step by step without complicating the process.
IGNOU doesn't expect that you write a doctoral thesis. But it doesn't accept casual, copy-paste work either. The project lies somewhere in between. The university hopes to see three elements clearly.
First, how well you know the topic you have chosen. Third, if you're able to gather and analyze relevant data. Third, do you be able to explain your findings logical and organised way.
Many students suffer from low marks not because their topic is weak however, their goals, analysis, and conclusions don't match. IGNOU examiners spot this gap quickly.
The choice of topics is where the majority of students are sloppy. Either they select something that is too broad, or choose something that appears attractive, but is not relevant information. Both are problematic later.
A good M.Com assignment topic would be:
You can connect your syllabus to the course.
Affords enough acuity to properly study
This is supported by data
For instance, "A Study of Marketing Strategies" is too vague. "A Study on Marketing Strategies of Patanjali Products in Urban Areas" is still a risky proposition as long as you have the data. A more secure version is "A Study on Consumer Perception Towards Patanjali Products in [City Name]."
Always ask yourself a simple questions before settling on a subject: Can I realistically find out the information I need within all the resources and time available? If the answer isn't clear, consider rethinking the subject.
IGNOU requires approval of the synopsis prior to the project is completed. A lot of students slack through this stage only to regret the decision later. The synopsis does not have to be the only formality. It's the main document on that your entire plan is scrutinized.
A standard M.Com summary of the project for IGNOU includes:
Title of the study
Introduction
Description of the problem
Objectives
Research methodology
Scope and Limitations
References
The objectives must be simple and concise in their the number. Three to five objectives are ideal. Writing ten objectives only creates confusion during analysis. Once your synopsis is approved, avoid changing the topic or the methodology. Significant deviations can lead to failure during the assessment.
IGNOU adheres to a standard academic structure. You don't get extra points by playing around with different formats. Make sure you stick to what works.
This chapter explains what the study is all about and why it's crucial. It includes the background of this topic, as well as the problem statement, goals, scope, and limitations.
The problem statement should not be dramatic. It should be a simple explanation of the gap or subject matter the study is working to resolve. The objectives should be outlined clearly and directly. This chapter is the guiding principle for all of the project. Hence, clarity here saves trouble later.
The review of literature shows that you're not working in an isolated manner. It summarizes prior studies that are related to your chosen subject. It could comprise journal articles and theses, reports or published research.
Each section should be brief described. Do not overload this chapter with unnecessary details. The goal is to highlight what has already been studied and how your research fits within. This chapter's conclusion with a brief overview of previous studies and your current research adds value to this section.
This is among the most important chapters from an evaluation point an evaluation point of. The chapter explains how the research was conducted.
It is important to clearly state:
Research design
Sources of data (primary and secondary)
Sample size and sampling method
Tools used for data collection
Analytical techniques used in the analysis
If you used questionnaires explain how they were distributed and to who. If you relied on secondary data, you must clearly identify the sources. Avoid vague explanations. Clarity here can help establish credibility.
This chapter will carry the full burden of your task. The data should be presented in charts, tables, or graphs, if needed. In addition, every table has to be followed by explanation.
Many students make the mistake of explaining what the table shows instead of defining what it signifies. Interpretation should link the data with the main goals of the study. When one of the objectives is study customer satisfaction, then your interpretation must be able to clearly articulate what the data tells us about levels of satisfaction.
This chapter summarises the outcome of the research. Findings should always be written pointwise and directly resulted from the analysis. The suggestions must be based on facts that are based on data, not on personal opinions.
The conclusion should concisely summarize why the study was conducted as well as the overall conclusions. It is best not to introduce new information or arguments here. A concise conclusion makes an impression more strongly more than a lengthy and lengthy conclusion.
IGNOU prefers simple and clear academic language. You do not need complex vocabulary. What matters is whether your ideas are simple to understand.
In the third person, write. Keep the tense consistent. Avoid emotional language. Additionally you should not write as a machine. Natural flow and clear explanations works best.
Formatting should follow academic standard guidelines:
A4 size paper
1-inch margins
12-point font
1.5 Line spacing
Properly paginated page numbers
Tables and figures should be numbered and named. References must be cited consistently.
Plagiarism poses the greatest risk. Copying content directly from websites or previous projects is easily found. Even there is no plagiarism software used, examiners can recognise repeatedly copied content.
Another common error is a poor alignment. While objectives mention one thing, examination reveals another, and the conclusion is entirely different. This indicates a lack of planning.
In the absence of synopsis approval, and making a submission that is in significant ways from the approved version can also cause problems.
Before you submit, go through the overall project and not one chapter at a time. Make sure the flow of the project makes sense. Verify references, tables and formatting. Be sure that certificates, declarations and acknowledgements are in place according to IGNOU requirements.
Making sure you submit a neat, organized project on time will reduce anxiety in the final stages.
Writing for an M.Com assignment for IGNOU MCOM Project University is less about intelligence, and mostly about discipline. Students who prepare early and adhere to the guidelines and are able to write clearly rarely get rejected. This is a chance to demonstrate their understanding of subjects in commerce. It is not a test of the latest research terminology.