Presently, there isn’t much that’s known about EA and DICE’s next military shooter other than it’s confirmed to be in development for PS5 and Xbox Series X. Much of the discussion around it, as such, has been just speculation and rumor, with the most popular currently being that Battlefield 6 will return to a modern setting , following Battlefield 1 and Battlefield 5 ’s detours in the World Wars. But as far as actual gameplay information goes, that’s been nonexistent so

Battlefield needs to reinvent its image , and that could be as simple as looking to the past to inspire the future. The Bad Company games in particular would be a good start, as these games never truly took themselves seriously. Even though Bad Company 2 eschewed a lot of the silliness from the first game, multiplayer in Battlefield: Bad Company 2 was the right balance of simulation vs. fun factor. Battlefield could definitely use a dose of that nowadays, especially after Battlefield

Battlefield 5 's reveal and lead up to release genuinely had a lot of hype surrounding the game, despite igniting an equal amount of controversy over its depiction of World War II . DICE's development team was rolling out an ambitious update schedule based around real-life events from 1940-1945. Each expansion would emphasize several milestone events that occurred chronologically throughout the war. Conceptually, it was a radical and positively received idea, one that'd be worth revisiting, but the main issue with Battlefield 5 was mounting stability issues and competition getting in the way of the game's ambit

For EA, putting Battlefield back into a modern setting may also prove to be a way to win back some fans. Leading up to the reveal of Battlefield 5 , there was a large part of the fanbase hoping for a game set in modern times. This is in large part due to the freedom it carries with it. There tends to be a larger, more diverse arsenal of weapons to play around with, not to mention a better selection of boats, tanks, fighter jets, and helicopters, all of which lead to combat that feels like it's happening on a much grander sc

It's no secret that EA's biggest shooter franchise has had a rough time recently. Apex Legends has done surprisingly well, but that's mostly because it was designed by Respawn Entertainment, without EA's proprietary Frostbite engine. No shame to Frostbite, as some of the capabilities of the engine for Battlefield games are incredible. But in recent years, Battlefield has seen somewhat of a decline from the mainstream shooter it used to be. battlefield 2042 story guide|https://battlefield2042hq.com/ 6 is said to be the very next entry, and it needs to make a comeb

Henderson wouldn’t say if this means DICE will be bringing 64-vs-64 modes to Battlefield 6 as well, but did suggest that EA and DICE are considering putting that increased player count to use in some sort of battle royale, citing "increased interest" from the two due to the success of Call of Duty: Warzo

The Battlefield franchise has evolved quite a bit since the last entry in a modern setting. Loot boxes, season passes, and changes to DLC structure have all brought major shifts in the video game industry– shifts that Battlefield 6 will inevitably have to navigate. While there are plenty of things fans want EA to include in Battlefield 6 , there also needs to be a feeling of refinement for the aspects of the franchise that haven't been working. Modern settings have been explored in-depth in the past by Battlefield , which should give EA a better sense of what its fans want in terms of cont

For now, players are going to have to stick with Battlefield 5, whether they enjoy the World War 2 setting or not. There's still quite a bit of time until Battlefield 6 is ready to go, though it will likely be the product of market shifts between now and when it actually launches. It's fair to assume that the development of the game is already well underway, and with the last two games taking place in the past, there's a good chance that players will return to a modern sett

For the better part of the last decade, the Battlefield series was the popular place to go for large-scale online multiplayer in the FPS space, offering players the opportunity to shoot it out on large maps in 64-player matches. That number’s almost quaint nowadays in the age of battle royale shooters that can support up to 200 players per match , but if the latest from the rumor mill is to be believed, it’s going to be bumped up considerably for the upcoming Battlefield

Team composition and/or dedicated roles in Call of Duty multiplayer is a very rare thing. Average players will stick to their favorite guns and perks in Modern Warfare , and the match will play out to various results. It's a highly open-ended approach that's proved to be the boon of the franchise thus far, but Battlefield handles things a bit more traditiona

For Battlefield to reignite the "who's better" arguments from its past, the franchise will need to seriously focus on what used to be the game's signature identity. Destructible environments have been a staple in Battlefield thanks to the graphically impressive physics in the Frostbite engine. It's never been taken out of the game per se, but with each new release the destruction has been taken out of the spotlight. Destruction was huge for Bad Company and Bad Company 2 because it was both free-flowing and integral to the map design. Battlefield 3 introduced "Levolution" to try and mix up the mechanic, but in turn made destruction much more linear and predictable. Reinventing a more unpredictable destruction system would be the perfect way to bring back classic Battlefield in a brand new fo