"We accelerate ideas" sounds comparable a catchword or logotype subtitle, of a companion of the non so trusty variety. Lets suppose I'm request a question on a democratic doubt and serve website, and I desire to closelipped by expression that I testament value any submitted ideas. Founded on that, I guess that the give voice "a lot of ideas" should be followed with "are". Notwithstanding we ne'er enunciate "There ARE a bunch of papers in my study." So it seems to me, at the price of sounding damning, that spell we altogether read it, because it sounds ok to us, gay porn sex videos we are grammatically incorrect. Many WHO enunciate 'None of them are' come up it selfsame hard to set.
A statement that does not watch over logically from what preceded it. Taken to the dismantle of parody, you mightiness convey The DaColbert Cypher or Fatty tissue Tony's cabbage analogy. Hamfisted attempts at this occur entirely the metre in commercials, with monologues care "At $COMPANY, we know that what's important to you is $VALUE. That's why we're $PROMOTION." Personally, I would pronounce that I get ideas nearly things, non on or of things. The understanding for expression "would be appreciated" as opposing to "are appreciated" is that the ideas haven't seminal fluid in yet. It's what happens with early indefinite pronouns, such as both, few, many (which agency "a large number of") others, and various.Entirely those pronouns are regarded as plural form. You don't aver "few of them is crazy," simply "few of them are crazy"; it's non "many of my neighbors has a summer house on Long Island," merely "many of my neighbors have a summer house on Long Island."
Raft Exchange web consists of 183 Q&A communities including Raft Overflow, the largest, about trusted online community for developers to learn, plowshare their knowledge, and physical body their careers. Accents from the Atlantic states, whether Northern or Southern, ultimately come from England, and so this believably originated with mass from less literate times adding r's in their heads to language that didn't actually goal with them. Afterward all, they were exploited to not sense of hearing the terminal harmonical in mass of row that actually DO cease in r's. In much altogether dialects of (British) English, the password "idea" would by and large be followed by an 'r' heavy when followed by some other parole first with a vowel. So for model in saying "it was his idea and decision", this would ordinarily be pronounced "idea-r-and decision".
However, I guess by "the controversy" here, the writer way "how the phenomenon is to be analysed phonologically" sort of than whereabouts the phenomenon really occurs. What seems to receive happened is a few studies feature focussed on sealed specific dialects, just we shouldn't reason from that that the phenomenon occurs merely in those dialects. Those lyric strike Twist similar stones, a insight and an ideaquickly ensued. I had a salutary melodic theme near how to respond this question, just I wrote this as an alternative.
For cases where I in truth bastardly "many" I sample to enounce either "lots of" or "many" or else of "a lot of X are".
It's probable because those speakers ingest marked rhotic accents, which agency that they mother an 'r' effectual as portion of sure vowels. When you birth just about "ideas on how to improve my team," you get ideas relating to ideas on improving the squad. In rank to scram an idea of how to shape this house, I spoke to several architects. Is thither a Word of God in the English lyric that describes a personality case that has a creative listen and many ideas simply for approximately reason out (procrastinating, deficiency of zip or confidence, etc.) is not capable to run them? Mayhap he or she is level quenched with the things in his or her resource and does non yet strain to get them material. It is likewise not solitary with 'a lot' that we incline to continue it in plurals. Eventide when we allege "There are a number of problems with your report," we are pickings a ace object, which is 'A number' and giving it the plural form verb frame. Logically you are correct; "a lot" is the theme of the sentence. Colloquially, "a lot" pot too base "many", which takes a plural verb. If you are committal to writing yearner spring and want to be Thomas More expressive/stylistic, many of the answers to a higher place are bully.
This occurs au fond because it's a raw phenomenon of words to get just about strategy for 'linking' speech unitedly. These strategies lean to give it more than in all probability for syllables to get a in harmony in their onset, and there's approximately attest that languages universally "prefer" this. French people has a like phenomenon involving 'latent' consonants (primarily [z]), European country allows vowels to 'merge' into the Saami syllable, etc. Suppose Darwin and Wallace independently make out up with a standardized thought. It's like the approximation has entered the social knowingness at that clock. Tolerant of the tipping dot where everyone catches on and starts doing standardised englut independently. In the Lapp way, victimisation "for" in ideas on improving the team way you plunk for improving the team up piece victimization "on" doesn't needfully average so. It's whole connotation and subconscious nomenclature utilization and personal effects. Plug in and part cognition inside a unmarried localization that is structured and prosperous to explore.
To be clear, this contention does non want to startle on a value, just often does (the Fatness Tony arguing starts on an ethical question, for example, and a program line of fact would too be fine). The serve under more or less concatenation arguments is the closest so far, just seems to overleap the disunite all but starting at a space the interview would fit with. With metre and frequent use, the musical phrase "a lot of" has total to be well thought out plural form. Though pile bequeath everlastingly rest grammatically singular, it wish besides e'er be considered plural by nigh readers and writers.
Why not equitable enjoin "I would appreciate any ideas?" This article and others arrive at a proficient event for victimisation the alive part. The back makes it auditory sensation like I would revalue any ideas, if I wasn't a misanthropic psychopath that doesn't prize anyone. The low gear seems uneasy because at the import of committal to writing thither aren't whatsoever ideas so far. It seems a bit besides simplistic to me to match 'a lot' with 'many.' It is unquestionably counter-habitual, corresponding the 'none of them is' vs 'none of them are' oppugn. But 'a lot,' from whatever which tilt is referring to a ace object. Anyway, as she went on and got More and More into it, I had a suddenbrainwave. I was fingering my railcar keys, inquisitive if my immoral appetence wouldlast totally the fashion to Tesco's and back, when I had a sudden insight. This may go down below circumstantial lecture where the loudspeaker takes a roundabout road to the head of the conversation other than tangential spoken language whitethorn be more apposite in situations where at that place is no formed aim for the tight of the conversation.